Strict constructionism is a legal philosophy that interprets the Constitution and laws based on their literal meaning and the original intent of the framers. Strict constructionists believe that the text should be understood as it was written, without inferring broader meanings or applying contemporary values. This approach often limits judicial interpretation and emphasizes the importance of adhering closely to the Constitution's wording. Proponents of strict constructionism argue that it preserves the rule of law and prevents judges from imposing personal beliefs on legal matters. Critics, however, contend that this philosophy can lead to outdated interpretations that fail to address modern societal issues, potentially undermining the U.S. Constitution's relevance.