Judicial Restraint is a legal philosophy that encourages judges to limit their own power and avoid making broad rulings. Instead of interpreting laws based on personal beliefs or societal changes, judges practicing judicial restraint focus on the original intent of the law and the Constitution. This approach promotes stability and predictability in the legal system.
Judicial restraint often means deferring to the decisions made by legislatures and elected officials. Proponents argue that this respect for the democratic process helps maintain the balance of power among branches of government, ensuring that judges do not overstep their authority or impose their views on society.