Lantz v. Coleman
In the case of Lantz v. Coleman, the dispute centered around a property boundary issue. The plaintiffs, Lantz, claimed that their neighbor, Coleman, had encroached on their land by building a fence that extended beyond the agreed-upon property line. This led to a legal battle over the rightful ownership and use of the disputed land.
The court examined evidence, including surveys and testimonies, to determine the accurate property boundaries. Ultimately, the ruling clarified the property lines and addressed the encroachment, ensuring that both parties understood their rights and responsibilities regarding the land in question.