Discretionary Justice refers to the flexibility that judges and legal authorities have in making decisions within the legal system. This concept allows them to interpret laws and apply them based on the specific circumstances of a case, rather than strictly adhering to mandatory sentencing guidelines. This can lead to more personalized outcomes in legal proceedings. However, discretionary justice can also raise concerns about fairness and consistency. Different judges may make different decisions in similar cases, leading to potential disparities in how justice is administered. Critics argue that this variability can undermine public trust in the legal system and its ability to deliver equitable outcomes.