The "Critique of Historicism" refers to the philosophical argument against the idea that historical events unfold according to predetermined laws or patterns. Critics argue that this perspective oversimplifies complex social dynamics and ignores the role of individual agency. It challenges the notion that history can be fully understood through generalizations or theories, emphasizing the uniqueness of each historical moment. Prominent thinkers like Karl Popper have contributed to this critique, asserting that historicism can lead to dogmatic beliefs about the future. They advocate for a more open-ended approach to history, recognizing the unpredictability of human actions and the influence of unforeseen events on historical development.