In the case of State v. Johnson, the defendant, Johnson, was charged with a crime related to theft. The prosecution presented evidence that suggested Johnson was involved in the unlawful taking of property from a local business. The defense argued that there was insufficient evidence to prove Johnson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The court examined the evidence and testimonies presented by both sides. Ultimately, the judge or jury would determine whether Johnson was guilty or not based on the legal standards of proof. The case highlights the importance of due process and the rights of the accused in the criminal justice system.